CaseStudy Analysis: Medical Center of Southern Indiana
CaseStudy Analysis: Medical Center of Southern Indiana
Acase study refers to a description of the actual administrativescenario, which involves a decision that has to be made or a findinga solution to a problem. The situation could be real and has happenedbefore or some happenings have been disguised due to privacy. In acase study, one takes the position of the leader or manager in anorganization and his or her main responsibility is to solve a problemand make decisions (Stake, 2006). A decision has to be made eventhough that decision may be to let the situation stay as it is or dosomething about it. There are certain approaches or methods ofconducting a case study.
Casestudy analysis must not summarize the case, but to identify keyproblems, issues, alternative course of action, and appropriaterecommendations. Case study analysis is broken down into thefollowing steps, according to Stake (2006) (1) Consider importantfacts, (2) identify important issues, (3) Recommend alternativecourse of actions, (4) evaluate chosen course of action, and (5)choose and recommend preferred course of action. Case study analysisshould also consider the history, growth, and development of the caseunder study, its strengths and weaknesses, the kind of environment itwas developed in.
Thiscontextual analysis, the Medical Center of Southern Indiana (MCSI),is in view of a re-hunt task led by the creators. It was financed byan exploration association award granted by Indiana UniversitySoutheast. MCSI is a 96-bed, intense consideration clinic situated inrustic Southern Indiana. Data was gotten from materials gave by theclinic, daily paper articles, and various meetings with healingcenter senior managers. The case is composed from the point of viewof the healing center`s President and CEO, Kevin Miller, andincorporates numerous quotes from him so as to give dynamicknowledge. Senior administration explored the case original copy, anddischarge for instructive utilization and distribution was gotten.
Ina case study, after identifying the courses of action, each one ofthem should be evaluated using issues and facts that were identifiedearlier to be its strengths and weaknesses. Each alternative tosolving a problem and finding a solution should be analyzed to comeup with each costs and benefits before an alternative is preferred.There also different level strategies that should be analyzedbeforehand (Stake, 2006). These are the organization’scorporate-level strategies, business-level strategies, andfunctional-level strategies. Case study requires identification offactors that would be compared to the organization’s SWOT, whichwill help in determining recommended changes, while reviewing controlsystems.
Thecase concentrates on the period 1992–1998 and presents systemsexecuted by the doctor`s facility amid this period. Proceduresincorporate
• Increasingthe quantity of oversaw consideration contracts with back up plans
• Aggressivedoctor enrollment, maintenance, and coordinated effort
• Improvementof existing administrations, for example, crisis office, auxiliaryser-vices, and outpatient administrations
• Addingnew administration regions: a home wellbeing office, a talentednursing office, and geropsychiatric administrations
• Significantcapital consumptions for gear and office updating
Thecase closes in 1998, the first year that the doctor`s facility had aworking benefit since 1992. The case choice point is figuring outwhat new methodologies and/or modifications to existing methodologiesought to be executed with a specific end goal to guarantee thesurvival of MCSI. Discourse is intended to occur inside of theaccompanying connection introduced for the situation: 1) the ascentof focused powers and incorporated conveyance frameworks, 2)progressions in government repayment strategy, and 3) the expandedbartering force of man- matured consideration associations (i.e.,HMOs and PPOs). Assessment of methodologies requires students tosurvey the 7 years of money related proclamations and think aboutchose execution proportions to industry models that are given for thesituation. Industry midpoints are from the 2001
Chronologicalregistry of Hospital Financial & Operating Indicators, IngenixPublishing Gathering/Center for Healthcare Industry PerformanceStudies (CHIPS). Benchmark proportions utilized are provincialhealing facilities with less th
Whenconducting a case study, control systems comes into play especiallywhen uncovering reasons for organizational power, conflict, andpolitical concerns if there is any. Beforehand, there issues need ananalysis of how they arose. One cannot find a solution to issues thathave not been defined, according to Stake (2006). Therefore, it ishelpful to consider the organization in question to consist ofvarious components, for example resources such as equipment,supplies, and other materials, people who are involved in theseresources, and processes that creates great value in the finalproduct.
Finally,after identification and analysis of an issue or a problem during acase study, there has to be recommendations. One is required to statehis or her choice for the best recommended course of action.Explanation may be provided, which should flow smoothly and logicallyacross the case study analysis (Stake, 2006). The recommendationsshould specify the assumptions, which will be sued to come up with aconcluding statement on recommended alternatives and changes to theissues in question.
Stake,R. E. (2006). Multiplecase study analysis.New York: Guilford Press.