Logicin Everyday Life
Logicin Everyday Life
Logicalintelligence delineates that logic not only revolves aroundmathematics, and calculations but, it is also used in everyday life.It is through logic that individuals are able to tackle their day today problems. Other than tackling problems, logic is also necessaryin assisting individuals to think, and reason in a critical manner.In everyday life it is inevitable to find people discussingcontemporary matters such a religion, sexuality, and drugs amongothers. In fact, the aforementioned issues are often discussed amongyoung individuals. The older generation may indulge in issues such ascorruption, diet, and politics among others. (Lial et al., 2012).
Ineveryday life, logic is incorporated during arguments. There are waysin which different arguments are classified but, individuals onlylook into the reasons why the argument in question has ensued. Forexample arguments in regard to whether murderers should be punishedor not often have one solution. According to logic, murder is wronghence murderers should face the consequences. Through logic peoplelearn that the truth remains the truth, and it is only the actualtruth that can influence it. In the event where an individual raisestheir voice to argue out a point, other people may be intimidatedand instantly be duped to believe that the person is correct. Also,the act of retorting may be used as a weapon to convince theopponents hence a win in the argument. However, logic plays the roleof reminding individuals that tonal variations, and retorting amongothers affect the truth of the argument (Lial et al., 2012).
Pertainingto everyday life, logic may fail as most individuals strive to makedecisions for wrong reasons. Most people often let others influencetheir decisions hence their logic is not incorporated in the process.Additionally, logic strives to equip individuals with the knowledgethat it is impossible to influence the truth of certain things inlife (Lial et al., 2012). For example it is clear to see thatGenetically Modified Foods are not safe. For this reason, those whoendorse the safety of the foods are not entitled to the truth.Regardless of whether they have evidence to support their claims ornot logic reminds individuals that Genetically Modified Foods arehazardous to their health.
Ineveryday life, it is common to find individuals in a feud concerningcertain things on the basis of presence of proof. Through logic,human beings learn that the term “proof” is anything that istrue and not one that is speculated to be true (Lial et al., 2012).For example after the President of the United States PresidentBarrack Obama, legalized homosexuality in all the American states,there has been a good number of controversies. Most people, those whosubscribe to religion, are making use of the scriptures as referenceto “prove” the wrongness of homosexuality. It is howeverillogical to automatically assume that homosexuality is wrong basedon the fact that there is available evidence to support the claim.
Insummation, it is important to note that even the truth is criticized,and scrutinized before the final decision is made. Howbeit, ineveryday life it is not necessary for the aforementioned process totake place. For decision making on a daily basis logic simplyrequires that individuals focus on the truth rather than that whichis claimed to be true (Lial et al., 2012).
Lial,M. L., Greenwell, R. N., & Ritchey, N. P. (2012). Finitemathematics (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education